🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to unofficial tests where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."